The use of the insanity defense as a jail diversion mechanism for mentally ill persons charged with misdemeanors.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Heightened awareness and concern regarding the large number of mentally ill misdemeanants in jails has led to a search for alternatives to jail and to the development nationwide of jail diversion programs for offenders with mental illness. Two such mechanisms-diversion to civil commitment and the use of mental health courts-are briefly reviewed. In Oregon, however, a rather unique mechanism is used to defer mentally ill misdemeanants (in addition to felons) from the criminal justice system: the insanity defense, with subsequent placement of the individual under Psychiatric Security Review Board jurisdiction. Statistics regarding such use from 1978 to 2001 are provided. The authors compare and contrast this jail alternative with both mental health courts and diversion to civil commitment, and discuss questions related to the feasibility of larger-scale use of this mechanism.
منابع مشابه
The effects of a jail diversion program on incarceration: a retrospective cohort study.
UNLABELLED The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to determine whether a jail diversion program significantly reduced the number of days of incarceration over the year following arrest in a sample of seriously mentally ill (SMI) people who had been arrested for a minor crime. METHODS A group of 314 SMI detainees were diverted out of jail and into mental health treatment. They we...
متن کاملMonitored conditional release of persons found not guilty by reason of insanity.
This article reviews the recent literature documenting changes that have taken place in the management and treatment of insanity defense acquittees with the development of conditional release and monitored community treatment. The review demonstrates that conditional release is particularly important as a means of balancing the protection of society with the treatment of insanity defense acquit...
متن کاملInformed decision making in persons acquitted not guilty by reason of insanity.
Deciding to raise an insanity defense carries serious consequences. This is especially true for persons charged with minor offenses, for whom an acquittal not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) might lead to a longer period of incarceration than would conviction. Before raising an insanity defense, a defendant should be provided with information necessary to make an informed decision and shoul...
متن کاملThe insanity defense in Illinois -- a psychiatric perspective.
The insanity defense has come under increasingly strong attack by both lawyers! and psychiatrists,2 at least in part, because of its lack of clarity in relating mental illness to criminal responsibility. Recent scholarly publications3.4 have exhaustively reviewed the pertinent medical-legal, social, and philosophical issues surrounding the contemporary debate regarding retention or abolition of...
متن کاملEmpirical research on the insanity defense and attempted reforms: evidence toward informed policy.
This paper addresses some common questions about the insanity defense and issues raised by commonly proposed "reforms." The first section begins with a brief description of the insanity defense and the reasons for its existence in the law. It then examines some of the popular myths and public misperceptions surrounding the insanity defense. The next three sections discuss proposed "reforms" and...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
دوره 33 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005